Harry Potter: Fan Edits Entire Film And Replaces All Wands. We know of at least 4 (Crabbe, Goyle, and the Malfoys) of the Death Eaters had children of their own in the castle. Answer (1 of 12): Voldemort could not be killed via “normal” (I personally find guns barbaric in almost all instances, so… normal is subjective) means for a number of reasons: It’d have made for a very dull tale indeed. Someone rightly said that the books just wouldnt have done as well with guns. You can easily teach someone to use a gun in an hour. Why dont wizards use firearms in Harry Potter? As a part of this wider discussion we’ll examine why the average wizard doesn’t use. the Why didnt they just shoot Voldemort? thread. Pretty much any Harry Potter title can be modified to accommodate Harry Potter and modern firearms, which makes for an interesting change of pace. Rowling Is Facing Backlash From LGBTQ. Rowling say that a gun would beat a wand. The Summoning Charm (Accio) was a charm that summoned an object toward the caster. This made it so Voldemort can touch Harry, but it also tied Harry to life for as long as Voldemort lives. The only reason, the only GOOD reason why they didnt shoot Voldemort is because Harry just plain didnt think of doing it and seeing as how both he and. Why didnt Harry die in the Forbidden Forest?. Remember: gun-control means that Voldemort wins. Re: The reasons why Harry Potter wizards dont use guns None of them are sharpshooters, jet pilots, or explosives engineers. They have managed to pour over Harry Potter and the Philosophers Stones 169 minutes of juicy content and replaced every scene containing a wand with a gun. Short answer: Because, wizards and witches try to keep away from the Muggle world to a great extent, and modern Muggle inventions don’t hold too much value in the wizarding world. Goblins are also insulted by the wizards refusal to let them perform magic with wands. A logical and acceptable in-universe explanation of why Harry, Hermione and the Order of the Phoenix don’t use Muggle technology, specifically guns and knives, is that they never attempt to kill, but only to incapacitate or capture Death Eaters. I would not be supried if the answer is simply: they do not know about guns. Answer (1 of 37): Im pretty sure it came down to a choice by the author in favor of fantasy at the expense of realism. Pattinson recalled holding his wand like a gun with two hands on it as if he were n a Die Hard film. They were used simultaneously alongside all the gleaming armor, bows and arrows, spears, swords, polearms, shields, and castles that permeate traditional high fantasy flavor. The disarming charm is Harry’s signature spell, and he has a lot of experience using it. Giving firearms to children is a dubious choice at best, but there are few things that would have come in handier for Ron, Harry, and Hermione than a regular old gun. Theyd be more likely to hurt. Action heroes have always been quick to use any method at their disposal to take on enemies, and more often than not, that includes guns. Action heroes have always been quick to use any method at their disposal to take on enemies, and more often than not, that includes guns. Not using Avada Kedavra is what makes the difference between Harry Potter and Dirty Harry. 224K views 3 years ago. He cant be superior if he uses knife or gun. Its not like they cannot learn a simple task only because there is no magic involved. As violent as Pattinsons take was until the end of the movie, using guns and killing people was a line this Batman never crossed. There has never been an instance where an elf uses a wand. Harry Potter Muggle Weapons / Headscratchers. It’s very possible that, using a Muggle object/artifact to kill someone in th Ha ha. So two questions, Why doesnt someone or Harry Potter just. However, gun ownership explicitly for personal protection has been banned since 1938, and use of a firearm in a self defence situation is generally illegal. Imagine Harry out in the woods, wearing his invisibility cloak, carrying a. If a wand can create any kind of magic, its actually pretty weird that no one ever uses it to just create a bullet and shoot somebody with it. It is the only book title to be changed from the original, with all other books keeping the U. ) #3 Anervouslhasaapso Sep 6, 2022 @ 3:04pm. Why dont wizards in Harry Potters world use guns? - Quora Answer (1 of 37): Im pretty sure it came down to a choice by the author in favor of fantasy at the expense of realism. Probably because a simple shield charm protects against tank busters and after the initial surprise the guns would be useless. Meanwhile, Brits have been cutting their steaks with spoons. The Hogwarts house refused to stand against Voldemort during the Battle of Hogwarts, and apparently, it still has a bad reputation. Wizards are humans, just like muggles. Might be a good idea for a surprise. Guns are used by a variety of organisations including military and police agencies, and by individuals to hunt and for self-defence. Its possible that any Time Turners not stored at the Ministry were later destroyed separately, for that reason: to stop Voldemort getting his hands on them. Harry Potter AI Art Imagines R Rated. Some people, though, suspect it to be manufactured. Even some scenes that have no. I know that wizards dont use guns, but couldnt they make an exception to tell some random trained sniper about this guy whos plotting to take over the country, if not the world? They could. Theyd be more likely to hurt themselves than what they were trying to aim at with any of those things. Why dont wizards use firearms in Harry Potter? As a part of this wider discussion we’ll examine why the average wizard doesn’t use muggle firearms. Why dont wizards in Harry Potters world use guns? - Quora Answer (1 of 37): Im pretty sure it came down to a choice by the author in favor of fantasy at the expense of realism. Muggle technology doesnt work around magic. It is one of the biggest and most noticeable differences between the U. I dont think Madam Pomfrey has any spells that can scrape your brains off of the trees and put you back together. Harry didnt die because Voldemort used Harrys blood to resurrect himself, taking Harrys mothers protection inside him. Why doesnt someone or Harry Potter just >So two questions, Why doesnt someone or Harry Potter just. Bullets are not as powerful as spells, protego (shield charm) probably would be able to block such an attack whereas the killing curse cannot be blocked by any such spell. Once they were connected, Quirrell was unable to touch Harry without burning his hands, but theres no reason he shouldnt have been able to when they met in Diagon Alley. 2K Share Save 187K views 2 years ago Hey everyone, Welcome to another. Voldemort had a dark plan for baby Harry Potter. Why dont wizards use firearms in Harry Potter? As a part of this wider discussion we’ll examine why the average wizard doesn’t use muggle firearms. Robert Pattinson on Why He Held His Wand Like a Gun in Harry Potter Home Entertainment Robert Pattinson says he held his wand like a gun in Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire because he thought it was so dorky to hold it like a magic wand Olivia Singh Feb 9, 2022, 3:22 PM PST. If they did that there wouldnt be a story. And while the Ministry might have been able to create new ones, they may have chosen not to, for the same reason. SomAcFXNyoA;_ylu=Y29sbwNiZjEEcG9zAzUEdnRpZAMEc2VjA3Ny/RV=2/RE=1683424111/RO=10/RU=https%3a%2f%2fharrypotter. Arguments the dim-witted harry potter fan gives as to why the gun wouldnt work 1. JK Rowling is on record as saying that a witch or wizard wouldn’t be able to stand up to a muggle with a gun. 10 Hilarious Harry Potter With Guns Memes That Are Too Funny>10 Hilarious Harry Potter With Guns Memes That Are Too Funny. (And yes I know that there are muggleborn wizards and that some wizards life in muggle cities, rowlings world building is not exactly the best. They use candles and fireplaces for light and heatin Because it’s fictional. That is pure conjecture, of course, but what isn’t is the fact that Fred and George Weasley state that most wizard’s can’t cast a decent shield charm and so–blam, you can kill a wizard. Trending SR Exclusives Star Wars Marvel DC Star Trek Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. Why didnt Harry use Avada Kedavra in the final duel?. RELATED: Wandless magic poses an entirely different approach to magic learning. Rowlings popular childrens novels about Harry Potter, the live-action family adventure film Harry Potter and the Philosophers Stone tells the story of a boy. By contrast, he’s never used Avada Kedavra, far less in a combat situation. The Ending of the Harry Potter Series Was Bad: Opinion. The answer has nothing to do with Hallows. Guns and artillery were a thing alongside all your favorite Medieval trappings. Guns can only shoot bullets: wands can do all kinds of stuff, including blowing things up, setting things on fire. From the Ministry of Magics perspective, theres simply no good reason for Hogwarts to teach students wandless magic when itd bring more harm than good. Harry Potter AI Art Imagines R. Last Will And Testament. Avada Kedavra, meet Avtomat Kalashnikova. But yes, Avada Kedavra was one of the curses that Harry didnt want to use. He cant be superior if he uses knife or gun. Honest question, why wouldn’t guns be used? : r/harrypotter. Why Dont Witches and Wizards Use GUNS? - Harry Potter Theory Harry Potter Theory 567K subscribers Join Subscribe 6. If Protego can stop humans, it sure as well might be able to stop objects. Why dont wizards use firearms in Harry Potter? As a part of this wider discussion we’ll examine why the average wizard doesn’t use muggle firearms. Why dont wizards use firearms in Harry Potter? As a part of this wider discussion we’ll examine why the average wizard doesn’t use muggle firearms. Probably because a simple shield charm protects against tank busters and after the initial surprise the guns would be useless. Why didnt Voldemort just Kill Harry the old Fashioned way? With …. Although Death Eaters are what we consider evil, not all of them are as bent on evil as Voldemort. Answer (1 of 3): Because it’s fictional. ” “Well, you were quite right,” said Dumbledore, who was no longer smiling, but watching Riddle intently. Robert Pattinson on Why He Held His Wand Like a Gun in Harry Potter. He tried to raise a shield but it was not in time to prevent the. We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. Why dont wizards in Harry Potters world use guns?. Something that is actually incredibly bizarre to realize is that in a roundabout way, a wand could literally be used as a gun. well heres my counter argument, 1. Re: The reasons why Harry Potter wizards dont use guns None of them are sharpshooters, jet pilots, or explosives engineers. Robert Pattinson on Why He Held His Wand Like a Gun in Harry Potter Home Entertainment Robert Pattinson says he held his wand like a gun in Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire because he thought it was so dorky to hold it like a magic wand Olivia Singh Feb 9, 2022, 3:22 PM PST. Voldemort Had A Dark Plan For His Final Horcrux In Harry Potter …. It defeats the whole purpose of being a wizard, which is to use magic. I don’t believe there is a definitive canon answer to this, but here are some plausible reasons: Experience. In the Harry Potter universe, elves are only known to snap their fingers and perform self-taught magic. Why dont wizards in Harry Potters world use guns? - Quora Answer (1 of 37): Im pretty sure it came down to a choice by the author in favor of fantasy at the expense of realism. Tom Cruises Ethan Hunt doesn’t fire a gun in 1996’s Mission: Impossible, and the reason why is a testament to the series unique position within the action genre. Answer (1 of 3): Because it’s fictional. Why didnt the harry potter people use guns? :: Hogwarts Legacy. The Hogwarts house refused to stand against Voldemort during the Battle of Hogwarts, and apparently, it still has a bad reputation. A gun, also known as a firearm, is a type of metallic weapon, commonly crafted and used by non-magic people, that operates by firing projectiles using explosive force. Harry Potter: Fan Edits Entire Film And Replaces All Wands. Harry potter with guns : r/copypasta. A gun, also known as a firearm, is a type of metallic weapon, commonly crafted and used by non-magic people, that operates by firing projectiles using explosive force. Why Doesnt Harry Potter Use A GunVoldemort would just be able to stop the bullet with magic 3. A gun, also known as a firearm, is a type of metallic weapon, commonly crafted and used by non-magic people, that operates by firing projectiles using explosive force. Firstly, the main defensive reflex of a wizard is designed to protect against spells, not projectiles. 2K Share Save 187K views 2 years ago Hey. Wizards dont have to invent the wheel again in order to use a gun. 10 Hilarious Harry Potter With Guns Memes That Are Too Funny. The actor said that he did that because he thought it was so dorky to hold it like a magic wand. Hey everyone,Welcome to another installment of Harry Potter Theory. Why didn’t Harry use “Avada Kedavra” in the final duel?>Why didn’t Harry use “Avada Kedavra” in the final duel?. Americans can chalk it up to Values Dissonance, but guns=bad here, especially in childrens works. Hermiones Solution Look, Draco Malfoy is a jerk, but this seems like a pretty extreme reaction, even if he did attempt to have Buckbeak killed. Its possible that any Time Turners not stored at the Ministry were later destroyed separately, for that reason: to stop Voldemort getting his hands on them. A logical and acceptable in-universe explanation of why Harry, Hermione and the Order of the Phoenix don’t use Muggle. He cant be superior if he uses knife or gun. Maybe its because Americans have spent the last 200 years shooting deer, playing GTA: Vice City, and keeping an eye out for black helicopters over their compounds. Voldemort will keep regenerating until the horcruxes are destroyed 4. I would not be supried if the answer is simply: they do not know about guns. Why Ethan Hunt Doesn’t Fire A Gun In Mission: Impossible. Rowling, known best for the Harry Potter series, is facing criticism over her support for a researcher who says theres no such thing as a transgender person. You can easily teach someone to use a gun in an hour. Short answer: Because, wizards and witches try to keep away from the Muggle world to a great extent, and modern Muggle inventions dont hold too much value in the wizarding world. Why didnt Voldemort just Kill Harry the old Fashioned way >Why didnt Voldemort just Kill Harry the old Fashioned way. The Trio dont use guns because in Britain only bad guys use guns. This spell needed thought behind it, and the object had to be clear in the casters mind. Why dont wizards use guns? : r/harrypotter. Hey everyone,Welcome to another installment of Harry Potter Theory. So no sleek, steel, murder-death devices for heroes. Anyway, Voldemort doesn’t just apparate into Harry’s room because of the special protection Dumbledore arranged with aunt Petunia. Harry Potter: Why Did Voldemort Use Nagini to Kill Snape. A logical and acceptable in-universe explanation of why Harry, Hermione and the Order of the Phoenix don’t use Muggle technology, specifically guns and knives, is that they never attempt to kill, but only to incapacitate or capture Death Eaters. Guns and artillery were a thing alongside all your favorite Medieval trappings. Refer to that restaurant scene in Deathly Hallows. Its very possible that, using a Muggle object/artifact to kill someone in th Ha ha. Rowling, known best for the Harry Potter series, is facing criticism over her support for a researcher who says theres no such thing as a transgender person. Wizards dont have to invent the wheel again in order to use a gun. Robert Pattinson on Why He Held His Wand Like a Gun in Harry. Why didnt the harry potter people use guns? :: Hogwarts. Why Dont Witches and Wizards Use GUNS? - Harry Potter Theory Harry Potter Theory 567K subscribers Join Subscribe 6. ’‘The Elder Wand cannot serve me. Might be a good idea for a surprise attack or an ambush (say Voldemort during the taboo and shoot everyone who apparates in) but you couldnt rely on it. Also as to why they dont use guns; wizards tend to shun muggle technology, they dont use computers, telephones, electricity, ball point pens etc even though they would make their lives alot easier (for example making a phone call is a lot quicker then sending a letter by owl). Why dont wizards use firearms in Harry Potter? As a part of this wider discussion well examine why the average wizard doesnt use muggle firearms. Probably because a simple shield charm protects against tank busters and after the initial surprise the guns would be useless. Hogwarts is supposed to be this magic castle that was founded a thousand years ago, and even though the books are set in modern times (the 1990s), their culture is still a bit medieval. The only reason, the only GOOD reason why they didnt shoot Voldemort is because Harry just plain didnt think of doing it and seeing as how both he and hermione both came from the muggle world and never once even lampshaded it I see is a major flaw in the whole series. Prior to the release of the first Mission: Impossible , the action genre was extremely firearms-focused, with films like Die Hard , Lethal Weapon , and Rambo: First Blood Part 2 still fresh in the memory. (Notice: I’ve only seen the Harry Potter movies. Call me stupid, but why dont wizards use guns? : r/harrypotter. I would not be supried if the answer is simply: they do not know about guns. Why Ethan Hunt Doesn’t Fire A Gun In Mission: Impossible>Why Ethan Hunt Doesn’t Fire A Gun In Mission: Impossible. 🍿 Movie: Guns Akimbo (Drop a like!)Darwins Game?#MinuteMoviesDiscord:https://discord. Action heroes have always been quick to use any method at their disposal to take on enemies, and more often than not, that includes guns. Pretty much any Harry Potter title can be modified to accommodate Harry Potter and modern firearms, which makes for an interesting change of pace. A logical and acceptable in-universe explanation of why Harry, Hermione and the Order of the Phoenix dont use Muggle technology, specifically guns and knives, is that they never attempt to kill, but only to incapacitate or capture Death Eaters. ‘All this long night, when I am on the brink of victory, I have sat here,’ said Voldemort, his voice barely louder than a whisper, ‘wondering, wondering, why the Elder Wand refuses to be what it ought to be, refuses to perform as legend says it must perform for its rightful owner and I think I have the answer. It was because Voldemort took Harrys blood into his body at the end of GoF when he created a new body for himself - and Lilys sacrificial protection was deeply tied to that blood. Wizards dont have to invent the wheel again in order to use a gun. Always, I knew there was something. It was able to summon objects in direct line of sight of the caster, as well as things out of view, by calling the object aloud after the incantation (unless the spell was cast nonverbally). The main reason why they didnt use Avada Kedavra is that they are attacking a school full of children. Why did no one shoot Voldemort?. Re: The reasons why Harry Potter wizards dont use guns None of them are sharpshooters, jet pilots, or explosives engineers. In the Kings Cross chapter, Harry asked Dumbledore this exact question. 2013-11-10, 06:13 PM (ISO 8601) Spoilers - Top - End - #9 Juntao112 Bugbear in the Playground Join Date. Harry Potter And The Philosophers Stone was changed to Harry Potter And The Sorcerers Stone in the U. Ron also nonchalantly admits to using a Confundus charm on a muggle, so evidently, its still fine to take away someones agency if theyre not a wizard. Tom Cruises Ethan Hunt doesnt fire a gun in 1996s Mission: Impossible, and the reason why is a testament to the series unique position within the action genre. They have managed to pour over Harry Potter and the Philosophers Stones 169 minutes of juicy content and replaced every scene containing a wand with a gun. Why didnt Harry Potter use guns?. Its not like Harry didnt use any of the unforgivable curses. Why couldn’t Voldemort have learned the critical lesson that he would not have been able to kill Harry Potter using magic. He ducked it in time to see Harry pulling the trigger of his gun! The rocket left the gun and flew straight to the dark lord, who had no idea of what it was or how to stop it. Harry didnt die because Voldemort used Harrys blood to resurrect himself, taking Harrys mothers protection inside him. Why dont wizards in Harry Potters world use guns? - Quora Answer (1 of 37): Im pretty sure it came down to a choice by the author in favor of fantasy at the expense of realism. Voldemort was pronounced incorrectly throughout the films. In this video, we’re going to be discussing the ministry of magic, the wizarding world as. Harry didnt die because Voldemort used Harrys blood to resurrect himself, taking Harrys mothers protection inside him. If you want to show someone being a nasty piece of work, then they get given a gun. Top editors give you the stories you want — delivered right to your inbox each weekday. The reason Harry didnt die was NOT because he was Master of Death, or because he physically touched the Stone. 50BMG Barrett, turning Deatheaters into pink mist, scratching a lightning bolt into his rifle stock for each kill. Wizards and witches are not like muggles, wands are their weapons not guns. A gun, also known as a firearm, is a type of metallic weapon, commonly crafted and used by non-magic people, that operates by firing projectiles using explosive force. God made wizards and God made muggles, but Samuel Colt made. I don’t believe there is a definitive canon answer to this, but here are some plausible reasons: Experience. reply / flag message 17: by Dilek (new) - rated it 5 stars Feb 11, 2014 11:51PM there are two options for me. Why Doesnt Hogwarts Teach Wandless Magic?. Author J. Why Dont Witches and Wizards Use GUNS? - Harry Potter Theory Harry Potter Theory 567K subscribers Join Subscribe 6. From the Ministry of Magics perspective, theres simply no good reason for Hogwarts to teach students wandless magic when itd bring more harm than good. Answer (1 of 12): Voldemort could not be killed via “normal” (I personally find guns barbaric in almost all instances, so… normal is subjective) means for a number of reasons: It’d have made for a very dull tale indeed. “I knew I was different,” he whispered to his own quivering fingers. For all of Albus Dumbledores genius, it really is a bit surprising that he chose to bestow the deluminator on Ron instead of a deadly weapon. The t is silent in Voldemort. Dumbledore revealed one of Voldemorts secret Horcrux plans in Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince, but the movies left it out entirely.